MERITOCRAT.ORG / RESEARCH FOUNDATIONS

Logic Page 10

Institutional Design and Legitimate Authority

A measurement system should not silently become a legislature, court, regulator, and market operator at the same time.

Functions that must be separated

Evidence

Records identity, contribution, timestamp, context, source material, and verification history.

Measurement

Selects performance metrics, baselines, counterfactual methods, uncertainty rules, and recalibration procedures.

Policy

Determines whether a measured result should create disclosure, compensation, taxation, access, licensing, or other consequences.

Adjudication

Resolves identity, attribution, valuation, conflict-of-interest, and procedural disputes through defined review and appeal.

Market operation

Handles issuance, transfer, payment, custody, trading restrictions, and any required financial compliance.

Oversight

Examines the system, monitors changes, publishes findings, and preserves authority to halt or narrow unsafe applications.

Why separation matters

The architecture contains both empirical and normative choices. A Performance Oracle can report an outcome, but it cannot by itself decide what society owes a contributor. Contribution Decomposition can estimate an allocation under a specified value function, but selecting that function remains a design and governance decision. A ledger can preserve records, but cannot independently confer legal status.

Minimum legitimacy conditions

Regulatory perimeter

The supplied DFI correspondence describes PBS/MPS as extending beyond securities administration and potentially implicating property and intellectual-property questions. The static model should therefore present securities regulation as one layer of a broader institutional problem, not as the sole source of authority.

Status: Proposed institutional separation-of-functions model.